45 C
Kuwait City
July 19, 2019
Gulflance
Home » Moon landing was giant leap for films
Arab Times

Moon landing was giant leap for films

This image released by Warner Bros Pictures shows Keir Dullea in a scene from the 1968 film, ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’. (AP)

Important part of cinema history

In 1964, Stanley Kubrick, on the recommendation of the
science-fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, bought a telescope.

“He got this Questar and he
attached one of his cameras to it,” remembers Katharina Kubrick, the
filmmaker’s stepdaughter. “On a night where there was a lunar eclipse, he
dragged us all out onto the balcony and we were able to see the moon like a big
rubber ball. I don’t think I’ve seen it as clearly since. He loved that thing.
He looked at it all the time.”

Space exploration was then an
exciting possibility, but one far from realization. That July, the NASA’s
Ranger 7 sent back high-resolution photographs from the moon’s surface. Kubrick
and Clarke, convinced the moon was only the start, began to toil on a script
together. It would be five years before astronauts landed on the moon, on July
20, 1969. Kubrick took flight sooner. “2001: A Space Odyssey” opened in
theaters April 3, 1968.

Science-fiction

The space race was always going
to be won by filmmakers and science-fiction writers. Jules Verne penned “From
the Earth to the Moon” in 1865, prophesying three US astronauts rocketing from
Florida to the moon. George Melies’ 1902 silent classic “A Trip to the Moon”
had a rocket ship landing in the eye of the man in the moon. “Destination
Moon”, based on Robert Heinlein’s tale, got there in 1950, and won an Oscar for
special effects. Three years before Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on
the lunar surface, “Star Trek” began airing.

It’s no wonder that the moon
landing seemed like the stuff of movies. Some conspiracy theorists claimed it
was one: another Kubrick production. But the truth of the landing was
intertwined with cinema.

Audio recordings from Mission
Control during Apollo 11 capture flight controllers talking about “2001”. The
day of the landing, Heinlein and Clarke were on air with Walter Cronkite.
Heinlein called it “New Year’s Day of the Year One”.

The landing was a giant leap not
just for mankind but for filmmaking. The astronauts on board Apollo 11 carried
multiple film cameras with them, including two 16mm cameras and several 70mm
Hasselblad 500s. Some cameras were affixed to the lunar module and the
astronauts’ suits, others they carried on the journey. Their training was
rudimentary, but they were filmmakers. Armstrong, Aldrin and Michael Collins
were all later made honorary members of the American Society of Cinematographers.

Those images, broadcast live on
television, were crucial proof for the mission. Filmmaker Todd Michael Douglas,
whose archival-based “Apollo 11” has been one of the year’s most acclaimed and
popular documentaries, believes they constitute some of the most important
images in cinema history.

Exposures

“How could you argue with Buzz
Aldrin’s landing shot with a 16mm camera using variable frame rate and shutter
exposures out the lunar module window?” marvels Douglas. “I mean, come up with
a better shot in cinema history than the landing on the moon. And likewise,
Michael Collins in the command module seeing the lunar module come off the
surface of the moon. They’re incredible shots on their own and they’re also
technically astute.”

The possibility of traveling to
the moon had long invigorated the dreams of storytellers. But the realization
of that vision, and the images it produced, opened up entirely new horizons.
The moon landing inspired films that greatly expanded the realm of science
fiction and began an ongoing dance between the space program and the movies:
two sunny industries driven by technological discovery and starry-eyed
daydreams.

Many of the foremost filmmakers
then coming of age turned to space. George Lucas debuted “Star Wars” in 1977,
the same year Steven Spielberg released “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”.
Ridley Scott’s “Alien”, suggesting a less harmonious universe, came out two
years later.

Science fiction runs on its own
parallel timeline. It resides beyond contemporary reality while at the same
time being informed by it. It’s built on future dreams past. Lucas was inspired
by the 1936 serial “Flash Gordon”. Spielberg, who later made Kubrick’s “A.I.”,
referred to “2001”, not the moon landing, as the genre’s “big bang.”

But,
unmistakably, a new frontier opened when Apollo 11 landed. Philip Kaufman
purposefully began his 1983 Oscar-winning epic “The Right Stuff”, based on Tom
Wolfe’s book about the daring test pilots of the space program’s early days,
with Chuck Yeager (Sam Shepherd) on a horseback.

“’The Right Stuff’ is right from
the beginning a continuation of the Western,” Kaufman says. “The hero of ‘The
Right Stuff’ is a spirit. It’s called the Right Stuff and it’s something that’s
ineffable. It’s the ultimate modesty in a way. It’s in the great laconic
characters of the Western. You don’t brag. You do your task in the best way
possible. And maybe, as in ‘The Searchers’ or ‘Shane’, you walk away at the
end.”

The extraordinary height of
achievement of the moon landing has ever since been a measuring stick for
America. The partisan reception to last year’s “First Man”, with Ryan Gosling
as Armstrong, was its own reflection of the country’s present. Kaufman, 82,
imagines an ongoing search for “the right stuff”.

“How do we refresh that sense of
adventure?” he wonders, citing the touristy lines on Mount Everest. “How do we
memorialize the landing on the moon not just with parades and
self-congratulation but a sense of reverence for the greatness of the people
who did it?”

Ever since the moon landing made
fantasy real, a strain of science-fiction has ridden scientific accuracy for
big-screen spectacle. Ridley Scott’s “The Martian” (2015) and Christopher
Nolan’s “Interstellar” (2014) took physics-based approaches to tell reasonably
plausible tales of space travel, with scientists as consultants. NASA helped
extensively on Ron Howard’s Oscar-winning “Apollo 13” (1995). Weightless scenes
were filmed 25 seconds at a time on NASA’s KC-135 plane, in momentary zero
gravity.

Ideas

Margaret Weitekamp, curator of
space and science-fiction history at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space
Museum, sees a reciprocal relationship between filmmakers and scientists, with
ideas flowing between the two – often to the benefit of NASA.

“When
you see films in the post-Apollo era that really capture the spirit and triumph
and the glory of human space flight, like ‘The Right Stuff’ and ‘Apollo 13’,
you see a direct increase in approval ratings for NASA and human space flight,”
Weitekamp said. “After ‘The Martian,’ NASA had one of the largest recruiting
application pools that they’ve ever had for the astronaut program.”

Other filmmakers saw something
different, and lonelier on the moon and the potentially lifeless reaches of
space. Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky, who found “2001” too sterile, sought
to make a more human space drama in “Solaris” (1972). The space station was
shabbier, the emotions more earthbound. The French filmmaker Claire Denis, in
this year’s “High Life” with Robert Pattinson, similarly went to space only to
wrestle with many of things she always has: sex, violence, parenthood. (AP)

“A lot of science fiction films
are about conquest,” Denis says. “In that void, that huge universe, there’s not
many things to fight, unless you do ‘Star Wars’ and there’s an alien living
there.”

As has been often said, we went
to the moon and ended up seeing the Earth more clearly. For Kubrick, glued to
the Apollo 11 broadcast 50 years ago, that was literally true.

“I remember very clearly when we
first saw a picture of our Earth, Stanley was immediately disappointed and
depressed that he hadn’t gotten the model of the Earth in ‘2001’ the right
color,” Katharina recalls. “In the film, it’s very pale blue and misty and
cloudy. But we hadn’t really seen it yet. We didn’t know how clearly we’d be
able to see it. He just said, ‘Oh gee, I should have made it bluer.’” (AP)

By Jake Coyle

Source link
Click here to read more news from @arabtimesonline

Related posts

Sword attacker escapee held

Arabtimes

Arrests made in ‘free-for-all’ at Souq Sharq

Arabtimes

Inzamam steps down, says Pak cricket needs fresh ideas

Arabtimes

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Please spend a minute

Gulflance Poll

Which is worst social media?
Vote Now
close-link
Sign-up for exclusive content. Be up to date with Gulflance
Subscribe
Subscribe
close-image

You're currently offline